With all great power comes great responsibility and as information professionals spanning all arenas of information we have a moral obligation to work from a place of universal ethical and foundational principles for all citizens. It is important to have codified ethical foundations to protect and monitor the profound influence information professionals have over the selection, aggregation, organization, preservation and dissemination of information.
As information professionals it is imperative that we regularly review and understand ethical guidelines set forth by professional organizations such as the American Library Association [ALA], the International Federation of Library Association [IFLA], the Association of College and Research Libraries [ACRL], and the Society of American Archivists [SAA].
The American Library Association has a code of ethics with nine principles, and lists twelve core values of librarianship: access, confidentiality, democracy, diversity, education, intellectual freedom, public good, professionalism, service, social responsibility and sustainability. These themes were interwoven throughout my classes at SJSU, with conversations and discussion posts in INFO 204, combined with INFO 234 analyzing the Library Bill of Rights and privacy policies for patrons, and lessons learned from an internship at the Golden Gate National Park Museum Archive, on the importance of preserving and digitization of oral histories for future access. This competency will be a moral foundation of everything I do in the information field going forward with the understanding that personal convictions might at times be at odds with professional duties and I must strive for and advocate for the intellectual freedom of all.
Ethics is defined by Garner as “a set of principles that guide decision making in a specified setting” which can be personal or shared. Additionally, “principles” are referred to as morals, values or beliefs, and are instilled by environment and upbringing (Garner, 2018, p 367). While these foundational ethical principles might appear absolute from a general standpoint, the many layers of nuanced context, and multiple interpretations of one’s own values and competing values can often lead to ethical dilemmas, or a conflict of personal vs professional values. We live in a political system grounded in informed citizenry, with polarized politics, rampant misinformation on social media and diverse views on anything and everything. With empathy and respect for all, we must recognize that our personal conscience is deeply tied with our own individual psychology and upbringing and therefore our personal judgments and preferred methodologies will be only one of many. Therefore, we must refer back to the stated principles set forth by professional organizations to act as an unbiased standard. As I go out into the information profession, these defined professional principles will act as a foundation for the future decisions I make in the field. It is not a matter of if library professionals will come up against an ethical dilemma, but when. Consequently, it is imperative that every information professional knows not only their own personal foundations, but also the professional standards of intellectual freedom upon which to base their reasoning and strategically embed these values within their technology and service designs (Jones & Salo, 2018).
The ALA defines intellectual freedom -the foundation of our democracy- as “the right of every individual to both seek and receive information from all points of view without restriction. It provides free access to all expression of ideas through which any and all sides of a question, cause or movement may be explored.” This definition is the foundation for many library’s service delivery models, going beyond equality/fairness to intentional deliberate strategies to make their information and services accessible to everyone, thus taking into account the varying needs of the whole population (ALA, 2007). These foundational principles also extend to the equitable preservation of narratives and information as one of the stated goals of libraries to preserve and disseminate information. To do so, libraries must collect the stories and information from all, and not just a few privileged groups (ALA, 2021). To make sure that everyone has access, and that all varieties of stories and inclusive modalities are preserved, libraries are taking intentional steps to limit economic, psychological and physical barriers that might erode processional values (Jones & Salo, 2018).
The right to privacy is essential to all libraries, and yet creates a paradox in operative practices in that the more data collected on patron usage the better libraries can curate and improve services and collections (Barth & deJong, 2017; Michalak & Rysavy, 2019). The Library Bill of Rights put forth by the ALA states in section VII: “All people, regardless of origin, age, background, or views, possess a right to privacy and confidentiality in their library use. Libraries should advocate for, educate about, and protect people’s privacy, safeguarding all library use data, including personally identifiable information (ALA, 2019).” Librarians wanting to make informed decisions on things such as hours of operation, resource collections, reference, and learning analytics face controversial, ethical decisions on their collection and analysis of user information (Michalak & Rysavy, 2019). There is also a paradox in the way many users approach the protection of their personal data, some are willing to divulge PII with assumptions that it is the price for utilizing free services which is reinforced by the many free electronic resources outside of libraries. Hence, it is imperative as information professionals to create user centered systems, with uninhibited access, protecting the user’s right to privacy and freedom of inquiry while empowering them to protect their data (Barth & deJong, 2017).
Description: In INFO 204, Information Professions we were given the real life ethical dilemma of the Seattle Public Library. We were asked to examine the situation, the ALA professional ethics, what the current administration of that library did, along with our own personal values, and then write up what we would hypothetically do and how we would evaluate the consequences of our actions. The issue was one of conflicting ALA principles: freedom of speech space vs. safe inclusive spaces for all. There were two different groups of patrons calling for action from the library, but using the ALA principle that backed up their argument as justification.
Justification: This is an excellent example of a process that made me see the real life ethical dilemmas I could face in the future, as well as the ways I will have to evaluate my own personal and professional beliefs alongside professionally stated values. As with this situation, there is no one right way or direct path, and both sides of the argument had intellectual merit. If I was in a position of authority to choose how to resolve this conflict I would have to rely back on the ALA principles, as well as bigger picture themes and my own ethics. This will directly relate to my job as a librarian as I will face ethical dilemmas on a regular basis.
Description: For INFO 234 Intellectual Freedom we had a Library Bill of Rights Assignment where we had to examine all of the American Library Association’s Library Bill of Rights interpretations, and then pick ten to summarize. This assignment and process of evaluation provided examples and guidance for myself as an information professional in applying ethical principles to real life situations.
Justification: Libraries are made to be a place of informed citizenry, a place where anyone has the right to access information. Often librarians will write the policies and rules of their organization, and I will need to be intentional and ethical in how I approach this process of determining policy, not only knowing the general Library Bill of Rights, but the specific interpretations of each and how my own personal bias and ethics relates. Knowing and having analyzed the Library Bill of Rights and many interpretations specifically will help me recognize violations, and the ethical foundational principles upon which this work is founded.
Description: For Intellectual Freedom we had to read and critique a state law regarding the confidentiality of library records. I chose California Government Code GOV § 6267 and looked at how much protection patron records have under that state statute, what libraries were covered, and what the penalties were for violating the law. I then found a privacy policy from the San Francisco Public Library and evaluated it with the California state law.
Justification: As a librarian I will be required to follow state and federal laws on privacy, as well as advocate for the privacy of the patrons of the library. It will be my ethical and moral responsibility to follow and uphold the intellectual freedom, privacy, right to access and utilize information of all people. This directly relates to the foundational principles of access privacy, and all of the core values of the ALA. There is also a broad assumption by many users that they must give up their privacy to access the services of a library and it is my moral responsibility to make sure patrons know their rights, and that policies are written with these foundational principles in mind.
The world of information is forever changing, and as such we must rely on ethical foundational principles as a standard to light the ever changing path. Ethical dilemmas are a reality I will face in my life as an information professional, and there are few easy answers, therefore it will be imperative to rely back to these foundational principles to guide me. While ethics, values, morals and beliefs will be forever in debate among intellectuals and philosophical circles, I believe it comes down to self awareness with empathy and respect for all people. As long as I keep these elements in my mind and heart I will have the ethical standards upon which to base a career as an information professional.
American Library Association. (2004, June 30). The freedom to read statement. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/freedomreadstatement
American Library Association (2007, May 29). Intellectual freedom and censorship Q & A. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/censorship/faq
American Library Association. (2019, January 29). Library Bill of Rights. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill
American Library Association. (2021, October). Access to library resources and services. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/access
American Library Association. (2021, June 29). Professional ethics. https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics
American Library Association. (2021, October). Privacy. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/node/466/
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2020, June 19). ACRL code of ethics for special collections librarians. https://rbms.info/standards/code_of_ethics/
Barth, S. & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
Garner, M. L. (2018). Information ethics. In S. Hirsh (Ed.), Information services today (2nd ed., pp. 366-377). Rowman & Littlefield.
Jones, K.M.L. & Salo, D. (2018). Learning analytics and the academic library: Professional ethics commitments at a crossroads. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.3.304
Michalak, & Rysavy, M. D. T. (2019). Data privacy and academic libraries: Non-PII, PII, and Librarians’ Reflections (Part 2). Journal of Library Administration, 59(7), 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1649969